b Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias de la Salud, (CIDICS) Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, N. L., Mexico. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, N. L., Mexico
An inactivated virus vaccine has been available since the late 1940´s but it only began to be used extensively when the influenza virus antigenic variability was taken into account. Aside from such variability, influenza viruses are capable of infecting a wide variety of vertebrates, (4) including many avian species, both wild and domestic, thus it is essential to monitor the antigenic characteristics of influenza virus strains currently circulating, and so the vaccine formula has to be evaluated and modified accordingly every year.
Vaccine indications
The efficacy of influenza vaccine is relatively low (70%-90%) (5) and vaccinated persons could have insufficient protection even to homologous virus strains, not to mention those viruses that have undergone antigenic changes, either drift or shift. Furthermore, other respiratory viruses such as parainfluenza, adenoviruses or respiratory syncytial virus could cause a similar illness, frequent anecdotal comments of acute respiratory illness (ARI) coincident with vaccine application is therefore not too surprising.
The risk of complications during an influenza episode, leading to hospitalization and death is higher in older people (≥ 65 years) and in those patients undergoing any of a well-known list of chronic debilitating diseases, (6) yet the benefit of the influenza vaccine should be weighted in different situations. In Mexico, the Ministry of Health (Secretaría de Salud) recommends vaccine application to people belonging to certain groups (7) (Table 1).
Additional information to make better particular recommendations for influenza vaccine use is available from WHO, (8) as well as from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices9 in the United States of America:
- Healthy individuals: vaccination may be recommended from age 50 onwards.
- Adults and children with health conditions such as chronic pulmonary disease (including asthma) or cardiovascular (except isolated hypertension), renal, hepatic, neurological, hematologic, or metabolic disorders (including diabetes mellitus).
- Persons who have immunosuppression, including compromised immune systems caused by medications or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
- Women who are or will be pregnant during the influenza season.
- Children and adolescents (aged 6 months-18 years) who are receiving long-term aspirin therapy and who might be at risk for experiencing Reye’s syndrome after influenza virus infection.
- Residents of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.
- Persons who are morbidly obese, with a body mass index (BMI) over 39.
You can read the rest of the article here:
Bibliography
1.Furnas JC. So you think you»re immune! Saturday Evening post 1954. 227:38-98.
2.Accessed on March 2014. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/fs211/en/.
3.Velasco Castañón JG. El affaire A/H1n1: de un brote epidémico a pandemia. Medicina Universitaria 2009;11:87-88.
4.Velasco Castañón JG, Medina de la Garza CE. Influenza aviar: la necesidad de estar preparados. Medicina Universitaria 2006;8:1-3.
5.Kilbourne ED, Arden NH. Inactivated influenza vaccine. In: plot-kin and Orenstein, Vaccines. 3rd Edition. USA: WB Saunders; 1999. P. 531-551.
6.World Health Organization. Vaccines against influenza. WHO position paper. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2012;87:461-476.
Medline
7.Accessed on March 2014. http://www.epidemiologia.salud. gob.mx/doctos/lineamientos/influenza/documento_tecnico_ influenza.pdf.
8.Accessed on March 2014. http://www.who.int/influenza/vaccines/en/.
9.Grohskopf LA, Shay DK, Shimabukuro TT, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization practices – United States, 2013-2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 2013;62(RR07):1-43.
10.Ward L, Draper J. A review of the factors involved in older people»s decision making with regard to influenza vaccination: a literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008;17:5-16.
11.Caballero P, Tuells J, Duro-Torrijos JL, et al. Acceptability of pandemic A(H1n1) influenza vaccination by essential community workers in 2010 Alicante (Spain), perceived seriousness and sources of information. Preventive Medicine 2013;57:725-728.
12.Nougairède A, Lagier JC, Ninove L, et al. Likely correlation between sources of information and acceptability of A/H1n1 swine-origin influenza virus vaccine in Marseille, France. PloS One 2010;5:1-9.
13.Livni G, Chodik G, Yaari A, et al. Attitudes, knowledge and factors related to acceptance of influenza vaccine by pediatric healthcare workers. Journal of pediatric Infectious Diseases 2008;3:111-117.
14.Blasi F, Aliberti S, Mantero M, et al. Compliance with anti-H1n1 vaccine among healthcare workers and general population. Clinical Microbiology & Infection 2012;18(suppl 5):37-41.
15.Septimus EJ, Perlin JB, Cormier SB, et al. A multifaceted mandatory patient safety program and seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers in community hospitals. JAMA 2011;305:999-1000.
16.Coady MH, Galea S, Blaney S, et al. Project VIVA: a multilevel community-based intervention to increase influenza vaccination rates among hard-to-reach populations in New York City. Am J public Health 2008;98:1314-1321.
17.Costilla-Esquivel A, Corona-Villavicencio F, Velasco-Castañón JG, et al. A relationship between acute respiratory illnesses and weather. Epidemiology and Infection. Epidemiol Infect 2013;2:1-9.
18.David SA, Velasco C, Balaram P, Mathan VI. Characterization of the interaction of lipid A and lipopolysaccharide with human serum albumin: implications for an endotoxin carrier function for albumin. Medicina Universitaria 2010; 12:248-9.


